katthen

katthen

onsdag 8. oktober 2014

World news, and how the major news giants differ from each other.

World news, and how the major news giants differ from each other.


In this task, I studied what similarities and differences the biggest news agencies in the world share. I found this topic very interesting, as the research I did provided a nice view of how the different agencies operates. Some focused a lot on ads and propaganda, while someone focused specificaly on solid information. Here is my thoughts;


  1. cnn.com
-The most important news placed at the top row with quick access to cases
-Breaking news and related articles placed on the left hand side
-Ads, stocks, weather and facebook/twitter links on the top, right hand side
-Autoplays earlier TV broadcasts on news cases


  1. BBC.com
-Only one news header which shows important news at the top
-Filled with regular, not-so-useful newspaper fillings (such as information about toilet seats and birds)
-More widespread news margins; Not only world news, but sports / business / science further down
  1. Foxnews.com
-Only one news article at the top, more tabloid material further down
-A lot of viral videos with content such as police beating people, and peoples reaction to other viral cases
-Higher amount of tabloid articles with misleading titles (the kind that has pictures of boobs and other irrelevant material)
  1. Al Jazeera
-Much more serious interface with no unnecessarities, such as commercials, stocks, weather and such
- Clearly marked articles with serious themes

Comparison of the news articles (about the IS bombings)


  1. CNN.com:
  • Lots of information about what got hit, why they got bombed, and the effects of it.
  • Summarizes earlier cases about the same theme


  1. BBC.com
  • Provides different tabs in the article with different points of information (such as UK role, analysis, and an overview map)
  • Very clean and readable layout of their page
  • Integrated video player, with their latest reports on the situation (kind of irritating, but useful for some, I guess.)
  1. Fox News
  • Clear, well explained information about the happenings
  • Maybe too much bent over to the pro U.S side of the case (several links to pro-US videos, with celebrities singing about it for example).
  1. Al Jazeera
  • The article contains heaps of information about present and earlier relevant articles, which gives insight
  • Provides a lot of information. Maybe too much.
  • Stands very neutral to the situation, with none or some infliction from the US.


I think peoples opinion about these can be highly different. For the average american who would like a side dish of gossip and interesting non-related stories, Fox News may be the best option. This site provides a wide selection of techonolgy news, celebrity articles, and “local” news.
On the other hand, the average person would prefer sites as BBC.com. Here, you get a sleek layout with plain news, and a handful of interesting articles which sustains a more serious structure.

At last, people which want a wider aspect without picking sides should check out Al Jazeera. This news site provides an entirely different view on the news story. Even though there is a lot (no really, a lot) information which may seem bloated, but there is still a lot of interesting read. After reading one of their articles, you will be left behind with a more open image of the situation where you can self reasonate what you think.

-u